Well Nathan, for instance in 'Thus Saith Jehovah's Witnesses' , on page 231 he speaks about where a person can go after leaving the Watchtower Society. I feel that he promotes his own cause, the cause of the miracle worker from Nazareth, therefor promoting his own ideology. In a number of other book from Freeminds, such as 'Refuting Jehovah's Witnesses', he also promotes his own agenda as though his doctrine is correct ahead of the Watchtower Society. Who could know such a thing?
On the grounds of sensationalism, page 16 of 'Thus Saith' speculates on the future of the Watchtower Society. Watters claims that he thinks the summary of changes and specualtion on the future of JW's is 'the best he has ever seen', as it is written by another person. Yet Watters supports these claims. These claims suggest that in 10 years the Watchtower will become to JW's as the International Bible Students are today - just a footnote. This was published in 2000, already we are in 2004 and I strongly doubt this will happen by 2010.
As I have said I support Randy because anything that paints a bad picture of the Watchtower Society is good enough for me, and maybe articles like this keep the EX JW community going. When I read it I was excited also. Because major doctrinal changes and bouts of Watchtower lies do not come thick and fast (well, not that thick and fast anyway!) then I feel some people may fall into the trap of sensationalising things to whip up a bit of excitment and shift a few more books.